Estate plans for couples and individuals should be reviewed and revised because of The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (the “Act”). The Act, enacted on January 1, 2013, to avert the so-called “fiscal cliff,” contains a number of significant estate and gift tax provisions including:
- A unified estate and gift tax exclusion of $5,000,000 indexed annually for inflation. For decedents dying after December 31, 2012, the exclusion amount, as adjusted for inflation, is $5,250,000 per individual.
- The Act also made permanent “portability” between spouses. Portability essentially allows the unused estate tax exclusion of a deceased spouse to be used by the surviving spouse.
- The Act also provides for a 40% estate and gift tax rate on the estate in excess of the exclusion amount of $5,250,000.
Prior to the Act, a typical estate plan for a husband and wife involved a trust that was created during the couple’s lifetime. Upon the death of the first spouse, the trust was either divided into two trusts (an A Trust and a B Trust) or divided into three trusts (an A Trust, and a B Trust, and a QTIP Trust.)
In a typical AB Trust plan, on the death of the first spouse, the deceased’s share of the estate, but not more than the exclusion amount, would be held in an irrevocable trust (often referred to as the “exemption trust” or the “bypass trust”) for the benefit of the surviving spouse, and the rest of the estate would continue to be held in a revocable trust for the benefit of the surviving spouse.
In a typical AB Trust plan, there was no estate tax due on the death of the first spouse, and the amount held in the exemption trust was not subject to estate taxes on the death of the surviving spouse. The surviving spouse’s share of the estate that was held in the revocable trust for the benefit of the surviving spouse (sometimes called the “A Trust” or the “Survivor’s Trust” ) would be subject to estate tax and an estate tax would be due if the value of the survivor’s estate exceeded the estate tax exclusion in effect on the death of the surviving spouse.
As a result of the Act and the $5,250,000 estate tax exclusion and portability, most couples will not need to use an exemption trust to prevent an estate tax from being imposed. For example, a couple with a combined estate of not more than $10,500,000 can leave the deceased’s share of the estate to the surviving spouse in a trust that remains revocable during the surviving spouse’s lifetime, elect portability on the death of the first spouse, and leave their entire estate to their children estate tax free on the death of the surviving spouse without using an exemption trust if the entire estate does not exceed $10,500,000 on the death of the surviving spouse. An estate tax return on the death of the first spouse is required to elect portability.
A significant advantage to electing portability is that the entire estate on the surviving spouse’s death will receive a step up in basis. Receiving a step up in basis on the death of the surviving spouse has the potential for reducing income taxes when assets are sold after the death of the surviving spouse. Another advantage of portability and leaving the entire estate to the surviving spouse in a revocable trust, is that it eliminates the exemption trust and the need to prepare an income tax return each year for the exemption trust.
There are situations in which an exemption trust still should be used on the death of the first spouse. For example, if the couple’s estate will continue to grow and will likely exceed the combined $10,500,000 exemption of both husband and wife, then an exemption trust is likely to be appropriate. Also, an exemption trust may be appropriate to avoid increases in property taxes as a result of changes in ownership where the couple’s real property value exceeds their residence and $1,000,000 of property tax value at the date of the first spouse to die. The use of an exemption trust is still appropriate where there are concerns of protecting assets from creditors, a remarriage by the surviving spouse, or concerns about management of assets by the surviving spouse or other beneficiaries. The exemption trust must still be used to have the benefit of the generation skipping transfer tax exemption for both spouses.
As a result of the changes in the estate and gift tax laws by the Act, individuals and couples should review and update their estate plans.
This article was written by Eliot S. Nahigian, a partner in the transactions department of Coleman & Horowitt, LLP. Mr. Nahigian represents clients in business and personal transactions including, advising and forming business entities and estate planning. Mr. Nahigian is a certified by the State Bar of California as a specialist in estate planning, trust, and probate law and taxation. Mr. Nahigian is also a certified public accountant. He can be reached at (559) 248-4820 or (800) 891-8362 or by e-mail at email@example.com.
About the Firm:
Established in 1994, Coleman & Horowitt is a state-wide law firm focused on delivering responsive and value driven service and preventive law. The firm represents businesses and their owners in matters involving transactions, litigation, agriculture and environmental regulation and litigation, intellectual property, real estate, estate planning and probate.
The Firm has been recognized as a “Top Law Firm” (Martindale Hubbell) and a “Go-To” Law Firm (Corporate Counsel). From six offices in California, and the Firm’s membership in Primerus, a national and international society of highly rated law firms (www.primerus.com), the Firm has helped individuals and businesses solve their most difficult legal problems. For more information, see www.ch-law.com and www.Primerus.com.
Disclaimer: This article is intended to provide the reader with general information regarding current legal issues. It is not to be construed as specific legal advice or as a substitute for the need to seek competent legal advice on specific legal matters. This publication is not meant to serve as a solicitation of business. To the extent that this may be considered as advertising, then it is expressly identified as such.