Prop 65 Listing for Roundup

Apr 12, 2017 | Environmental law, News

By Lee N. Smith
 
Prop 65 Roundup
 OEHHA has proposed that
glyphosate be listed with a No Significant Risk Level (NSRL) of 1100 micrograms
per day. For chemicals assessed under Prop 65 for cancer sets a threshold risk level which represents no significant risk shall be one which is calculated to result in one excess case of cancer in an exposed population of 100,000, assuming lifetime exposure at the level in question.
 
This glyphosate value was based on the results of the most sensitive scientific
study to be deemed by the agency to be of sufficient quality.  The effective date of this
listing has not been determined pending the resolution of litigation with
Monsanto regarding OEHHA’s use of the IARC findings.
 
The deadline for filing
comments with OEHHA regarding this listing is May 22.
 
California progressed in its effort to list Monsanto’s  herbicide a
carcinogen, after a judge in Fresno ruled finally in mid-March that the state could rely on
international standards in its effort require cancer warnings on Roundup.
 
“The Labor Code listing mechanism does not constitute an unconstitutional delegation of authority to an outside agency, since the voters and the Legislature have established the basic legislative scheme and made the fundamental policy decision with regard to listing possible carcinogens under Proposition 65, and then allowed the IARC to make the highly technical fact-finding decisions with regard to which specific chemicals would be added to the list,” Fresno Superior Court Judge Kristi Kapetan wrote. The IARC refers to the
International Agency for Research on Cancer, a division of the World Health Organization. The agency listed glyphosate – the main ingredient in Roundup – as a “probable carcinogen to humans” in March 2015. The listing prompted California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazards to file a notice of intent to list the chemical as possible carcinogen as required by Proposition 65, passed by voters in 1986. After office filed the notice in September 2015 Monsanto quickly sued, claiming the reliance on the IARC guidelines was unconstitutional. Monsanto maintains glyphosate is safe.
 

Established in 1994, Coleman & Horowitt is a state-wide law firm focused on delivering responsive and value driven service and preventive law. The firm represents businesses and their owners in matters involving transactions, litigation, agriculture and environmental regulation and litigation, intellectual property, real estate, estate planning and probate. The Firm has been recognized as a “Top Law Firm” (Martindale Hubbell) and a “Go-To” Law Firm (Corporate Counsel). From six offices in California (Fresno, Visalia, Sonora, Newport Beach, Bakersfield, and Los Angeles) and the Firm’s membership in Primerus, a national and international society of highly rated law firms (www.primerus.com), the Firm has helped individuals and businesses solve their most difficult legal problems. For more information, see www.ch-law.com and www.Primerus.com.

 

Disclaimer: This article is intended to provide the reader with general information regarding current legal issues. It is not to be construed as specific legal advice or as a substitute for the need to seek competent legal advice on specific legal matters. This publication is not meant to serve as a solicitation of business. To the extent that this may be considered as advertising, then it is expressly identified as such.